Why LegitBoosting Pays for Every Order It Ranks

That floor moves with the game and with how large a job you hand over, so a single figure would mislead more than it helps. Our monthly sweeps record what a site advertises and what it charges once the order is confirmed. When those two numbers drift apart, the gap lands in the pricing weight and costs the service points. Current entry prices live in the per-game tables, refreshed on the same cycle as the audit.

No, and the setup is built so you can test that claim instead of trusting it. Every weight is published with its percentage, every verdict names the count of paid orders standing behind it, and the audit date sits on the page. A company that bought its way upward would still have to account for a delivery log it never earned. Commercial links, where they exist, are disclosed and kept outside the scoring.

Five inputs, fixed weights. Account safety carries 35% and covers credential handling, hidden sessions and honesty about ToS risk. Delivery reliability and speed takes 25%, drawn from whether paid orders started and finished when the site said they would. Pricing transparency is 15%, what buyers report another 15% weighted by pattern rather than volume, and talking to support closes things at 10%. Totals land in four bands: 90-100 Excellent, 75-89 Good, 60-74 Fair, anything under 60 Poor.

Colin Hayes runs QA here, and his background is chargeback threads and scam complaints rather than press releases, which shapes where the attention goes: written refund terms, domain history, how a company answers its angriest customer. Nothing gets graded off a marketing page. Each of the 78 services in the roster carries a file with paid orders behind it, support tickets we opened ourselves and one deliberately awkward request. Claims we could not reproduce never make the verdict.